Search for: "Matter of Bright"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 5,383
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
On the bright side, this week, Law Shucks notes that some lawyers really are bargains at $1,000 an hour. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 11:00 pm
On the bright side, this week, Law Shucks notes that some lawyers really are bargains at $1,000 an hour. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:26 am
Our focus is on overtime pay and other wage & hour matters. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 2:28 am
However, the concurring opinion in 7(S) explains why there can be no bright line in reaching judgment on this issue: I agree with the view expressed in the dissenting opinion that an arbitrary use of a domain name normally does not create rights or legitimate interests. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:27 am
For example, if you are arrested for providing alcohol to minors in Sea Bright, New Jersey, this matter will be handled in the Sea Bright Municipal Court. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 9:54 am
However, when the relationship soured, the mother sought legal counsel and refused to sign a co-parenting agreement with the girlfriend; this was a key fact for the lower court in deciding that mother didn't, as a matter of law, relinquish custody to the girlfriend. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 10:37 pm
Yet no matter how many times people are exposed to that first sentence, they often tend to forget it or ignore it in situations where it really matters: You have the right to remain silent! [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:53 am
It now appears that the FASB may be ready to reverse course, and perhaps even to adhere to its current rules, which draw a bright line between capital and operating leases. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
That means that if there are not enough judges to clear the backlog, people charged with some of the most heinous crimes will walk free – not by judicial discretion but as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:13 pm
” The California Supreme Court has shortened its normal briefing schedule “to facilitate expedited consideration and resolution of the issues presented, and to accommodate oral argument in this matter as early as September, 2011. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 2:19 pm
” Thus, while a substantial step must be more than “mere preparation,” it may be less than the “last act necessary” before the commission of the crime.These standards, however, do not always provide “bright lines for application,” since the identification of a “substantial step” is necessarily a matter of degree. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Florida is the only jurisdiction to opt for a bright-line rule against judges “friending” attorneys who may appear in the judge’s courtroom. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:24 am
Mills corrected: That is not true as a factual matter. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:03 pm
Despite what you think law clerks are often times just as bright and knowledgeable on the law as a lot of our Judges. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 5:40 pm
Indeed, a good lawyer often seeks legal counsel himself, for two bright minds are usually better than one. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 1:28 pm
The discussants in several panels where this arose (Michael Lewis, Mary Ellen O'Connell, Jordan Paust, Amos Guiora, Geoff Corn), often coming from military backgrounds, tended to skepticism on the lawfulness of CIA participation - or if not skeptical as a matter of law, then skeptical as a matter of legal policy or legal best practices. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 6:28 am
The discussants, coming from military backgrounds, tend to skepticism on the lawfulness of CIA participation — or if not skeptical as a matter of law, then skeptical as a matter of legal policy or legal best practices.I myself have a less skeptical legal view — I don’t think the CIA is engaged in violations of the laws of war, to take the most basic issue, and the question of whether its agents are “privileged” in any particular instance depends on… [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:55 am
George’s Take Of course, it’s not a simple matter of pro-or anti-business; the Court applies the law, not its political inclinations (though the latter may play some role). [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:00 am
It is no longer sufficient for a federal court to find a reversible error in the trial, no matter how egregious. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:00 am
It is no longer sufficient for a federal court to find a reversible error in the trial, no matter how egregious. [read post]
