Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 7,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2014, 4:32 am
P. 37 and it inherent powers. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
What a shame that it has taken so long to reach this point, adds Merpel, who hopes that this decision will not be subject to a further appeal. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:40 am
Puma v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:30 am
P. 37.02. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am
ReputationThe Court began by noting that although market share was a relevant factor, there was no requirement for a mark to be known by a specific percentage of the relevant public, nor for its reputation to cover all the territory concerned, so long as that reputation exists in a substantial part of that territory (QUARTODIMIGLIO QM, T-76/13 EU:T:2015:94).Furthermore, in order to establish whether a mark has a reputation, an overall assessment must be carried out of the evidence… [read post]
28 May 2021, 8:31 am
P. 6.904(3)(k); see also Kufer v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 12:46 pm
Related Cases: Woodhull Freedom Foundation et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:57 am
But if the court were interested, this would be an interesting case to expound upon the “major questions” exception to Chevron that the Court identified in last year’s King v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:07 am
Hansen Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 2:00 pm
Let me quote two paragraphs from SCOTUSBlog: [P]etitioners contend that the City’s action violates Title VII. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
We did that not too long ago and came up with a new law review article, Samuel Raymond, “Judicial Politics & Medical Device Preemption After Riegel,” 5 N.Y.U.J.L. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:51 pm
Possibly, says the Third Circuit in Wallace v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 7:10 pm
The Wet Seal, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
I’ve been thinking about the 1968 Supreme Court case of Hunter v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 3:28 pm
In State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:06 pm
At p. 5 of his report Dr. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:25 am
CAT3, LLC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:26 pm
The argument this morning in New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:10 am
You should use this citation whenever you cite the opinion, with a P.3d parallel citation. [read post]
