Search for: "People v David S."
Results 4321 - 4340
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm
(David Bernstein) In comments to some of my recent posts, some commenters have suggested that few people nowadays get especially worked up about Lochner v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Applying Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of legal fields, the data suggested that both systems produce legitimacy but in quite different ways and, interestingly, that the one more similar to domestic legal systems takes that form due to political forces, not by an incremental process powered by people with legal backgrounds. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:19 am
Compiled online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
As many people know, the maximum compensatory award that can be made for unfair dismissal by an Employment Tribunal is currently £68,400 (less at the time Ms Shoesmith was dismissed). [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:21 am
One of those sources: David Segal’s much-discussed New York Times article, Is Law School A Losing Game? [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:55 am
Click here for the story.Commentary - Copyright (c) 2011 by John V. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:12 pm
” People v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am
From the Blogs David Allen Green, blogging as the New Statesman’s legal correspondent has followed the developing privacy story closely. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:14 am
All the people sueing for benefits in this case were killed or seriously injured in an accident where a David Wyloge was the driver of the car in which everyone was riding. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:36 pm
The decision in Brown v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am
For a second day, media outlets are flush with analysis of Monday’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
ACLU Lens: Supreme Court Orders California to Reduce its Prison Population to Alleviate Overcrowding
23 May 2011, 10:47 am
The decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:00 am
In Barnhill v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:01 pm
They are already compromising their supposed right to intrude into people’s privacy through the offices of the PCC. [read post]
21 May 2011, 12:08 pm
David A. [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:38 am
"David Plouffe's Latest Digital Campaign" http://j.mp/km2v1B an interesting proposal ... [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:47 am
" The only justice at the time who declined to be interviewed by Garner, not surprisingly, was David Souter. [read post]
