Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 4321 - 4340 of 5,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
That, in turn, led to his lawyers mounting a number of challenges in courts across the country, even reaching the Supreme Court in the case of Texas v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:29 pm by Nora Ellingsen
Rushforth then turns to Judge Waits’ relationship with Fred Taylor, who was previously part of the United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 5:01 am by Yuval Shany
On April 4, the Israeli High Court of Justice issued its judgment in National Responsibility v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, (IPRoo), WIPO Director General candidates’ presentations to members: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP rights arise in UN debate on the right to participate in cultural life: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP academies agree to galvanise efforts to promote IP education: (WIPO), What business people do to maximise protection of IP: (Ezine @rticles), Lorin Brennan’s memo on interaction between UNICITRAL guide and IP rights: (IP finance), … [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:38 am
And speaking of Osnos, and speaking of the main purpose of this post: SECTION V. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am by Jim Sedor
MarylandFacing Minor Fine, Hogan Campaign Lawyer Threatens Attorney General FroshWashington Post – Fenit Nirappil | Published: 8/31/2017 Maryland Gov. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 5:51 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(See an earlier podcast segment on the topic.)Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Front-end and back-end solutions.Death and TexasUS Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Ayestas v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:35 am by Eric Goldman
And get ready for a deluge of enforcement actions with the threat of massive dollar fines. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
It’s overly idealistic to act like, Oh, the Internet is the one place where people should be able to do whatever they wish: present child pornography, do scams, libel people, steal copyrighted material. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
 Currently, courts can issue unlimited fines for the offence, but not custodial sentences. [read post]