Search for: "People v. North"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 4,591
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2008, 8:36 am
A similar issue has been raised in Wake County v. hotels.com, and in jurisdictions throughout the country. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 6:29 pm
See North, 910 F.2d at 854. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:05 am
Burek v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 6:30 am
North Coast Women's Care Medical Group [PDF file], that doctors of the North Coast Women's Care Medical Group cannot deny medical treatment to people based on their sexual orientation. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:39 am
Seaport Park v Greater N.Y. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled unanimously on August 18 in North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 6:21 am
A spokesman for the North Brunswick Police Department, Lt. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:21 pm
Since most online gambling companies are located offshore, they deliberately evade Canadian or North American laws. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 12:54 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 6:02 pm
And also, for those in the Bay Area up north, mentions Hany Assad, who's another doctor (like the other one I discussed yesterday) who's more than willing to both prescribe marijuana and testify -- again, ultimately successfully, at least once the case gets to the Court of Appeal -- on behalf of the defendant. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:00 am
"North Carolina court to take a "fresh look" at the NC State "John Doe" cases, issues stay of subpoena to NC State in Elektra v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 5:45 pm
At least 69 people became ill. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In Wilkes v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 9:07 pm
In its opinion in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:26 am
Federal Trade Comm'n v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Finding people in this case to be "articles of commerce," the majority found the statute to be a form of unconstitutional discrimination against out-of-state commerce. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:47 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v Apotex:… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
April 28, 1987).North Carolina: Baraukas v. [read post]
