Search for: "S. Baker"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 13,512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2017, 9:59 am
Judge Lamberth also has before him the plea by General Baker asking for his release. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:42 am
Consequently, Baker’s adherence to contrary interpretations of the governing rules was a flagrant usurpation of the judge’s authority. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:43 am
The conviction comes as a response to Baker's refusal to testify about releasing three civilian defense attorneys [Navy Times report]—Rick Kammen, Rosa Eliades, and Mary Spears—from the case in mid-October, alleging the government was "listening in on their legal meetings," thereby violating attorney-client privilege.... [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am
He confined Baker to his quarters for refusing rescind the order. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 6:05 am
John Baker, the man in charge of military commission defense teams, guilty of contempt of court for refusing to rescind the order excusing al-Nashiri’s civilian defense lawyers, sentencing him to 21 days of confinement in his quarters and to pay a $1,000 fine. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:50 am
Supreme Court case—isn’t the only party to his challenge[:] His company, Masterpiece Cakeshop, is also a party, and a decision in favor of the baker could have wider implications for corporations and shareholders,” as an amicus brief filed on behalf of 34 corporate-law professors points out. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:25 pm
Baker’s Ginger (Law) Librarian blog is cited in Best of the Legal Blogs, 22 No. 10 Internet L. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 12:02 pm
Before they stepped out of the case, with Brigadier General Baker’s permission, they were advised by an expert on professional ethics that they had no choice but to exit from the case when they discovered that they could not have strictly confidential conversations with their client. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 10:37 am
At issue was Baker’s authority to excuse civilian, Pentagon-paid attorneys Rick Kammen, Rosa Eliades and Mary Spears from the case of because of a secret ethics conflict involving attorney-client privilege. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:59 am
Stewart Baker shared the Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring an interview with Chris Painter, former lead cyber diplomat at the State Department. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
He also ordered Baker to rescind the action excusing al-Nashiri’s civilian counsel and notify them that Baker did not have the power to accept their withdrawal. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 6:44 am
It’s called the “Phones Down, Heads Up Act” and was tabled by Toronto MPP Yves Baker of Etobicoke Centre. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
On this view, Baker v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:54 am
SCOTUSblog's case page has links to them, as well as to briefs of petitioner and respondent and to commentary on the case. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
For The Washington Times, Alex Swoyer reports that “[t]he Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request from a man who wants to be able to legally marry his laptop, saying he cannot intervene in the court’s upcoming case involving a baker who refused to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Whatever else one might say about Masterpiece’s claim, at least the baker was being asked by Colorado to do something that he found objectionable. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 4:20 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which asks whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding, in which he and the brief’s co-author Eugene Volokh argue that “the Free Speech Clause does not protect a baker’s right to refuse [the same-sex couple’s] request because baking cakes is conduct that is neither historically nor inherently a form of protected speech. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 8:29 am
It’s taken quite a lot of effort to pull together, but I think you’ll agree the line up is pretty sooper, and I hope that this – together with some enthusiastic audience participation – will make for a rounded and useful discussion of what is quite a chunky topic. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:07 am
Booking.com contended that the Fourth Circuit's analysis in Shammas was "overruled" by the Supreme Court's decision in Baker Botts L.L.C. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:02 am
Ct., 2013), the Enders Court seemed to agree with the Judge’s statement in Travis v. [read post]
