Search for: "STATE v COUNTS" Results 4321 - 4340 of 17,246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
   In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 6:12 am by The Swartz Law Firm
In the decision issued in Brewster v Heztel, the Eleventh circuit court of appeals agreed and reversed his Alabama state court conviction. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:53 pm by Joe Mullin
” The FTC alleged a count of “privacy misrepresentation. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Patentlyo discusses the question if the United States Government counts as "a person who is not the owner of a patent" in case Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:43 am by Erika Pickles
As the court explained: That practice effectively allowed a deceased judge to exercise the judicial power of the United States after his death. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 7:05 am by Kevin Goldberg
, V (featuring real-life fighter Tommy Morrison), and, finally, Rocky Balboa (why not just Rocky VI?) [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided February 25, 2019]Chief Judge of the United States Court Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Stephen Reinhardt wrote the court's en banc opinion in Rizo v Yovino. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided February 25, 2019]Chief Judge of the United States Court Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Stephen Reinhardt wrote the court's en banc opinion in Rizo v Yovino. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
First up is United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:01 am
Supreme Court on Monday said a lower federal appeals court was wrong to count a deceased judge in its majority decision in a major case involving whether employers can use salary history as a reason to pay a woman less than a man for the same work.The justices said in an unsigned opinion in Yovino v. [read post]