Search for: "STATE v. COLORADO" Results 4321 - 4340 of 4,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued March 22, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Singer v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:50 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 23848 (ED CA, March 15, 2010), a California federal magistrate judge concluded that inmates failed to state a claim against the California State Personnel Board in connection with their complaint that no Wiccan prison chaplains were hired for their facility.In Jackson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
On or about October 22, 2009, Wildearth Guardians filed an amended complaint alleging that EPA Administrator Jackson failed to comply with a mandatory duty to fully or partially approve or disapprove State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from the States of Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Utah within the time frame required by section 110(k)(2) of the Act and asking the court to enter judgment providing: (i) A declaration that EPA has violated and continues to… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
Text of the complaint and the proposed consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
(Settling Party) regarding the Colorado Bumper Exchange Site (Site), located at 4804 Dillon Drive, Pueblo, Colorado. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 11:21 am by David
  In Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 5:31 pm by Sandra C. Fava
As was the situation in the recent unpublished decision in Orero v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 8:19 am by Douglas R. Griess
Colorado Developments Regarding LLCs Now, the Colorado Court of Appeals in Colborne Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:11 pm by Ashby Jones
(Representing the United States will be Deputy Solicitor General Michael R. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
“It is critical that the state not offer carbon credits for business-as-usual management by timber companies or, worse, encourage clearcutting and other destructive logging practices while doing nothing to address the immediate impacts of climate change. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am by Stuart Buck
In so doing, the state apparently realized the futility of claiming that its expansive buffer zone law was supported by Hill v. [read post]