Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 4321 - 4340 of 6,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2007, 3:44 am
"; in order for a licensee to have co-plaintiff standing, it must hold "at least some" of the proprietary rights under the patent; "[b]ecause the trial court erred by dismissing Mitutoyo's willful infringement claim and including HFTUSA's sales in the royalty base, but rendered a proper judgment in all other respects, we affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part, and remand"Forest Laboratories, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am by John Elwood
Thanks to Ralph C. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:49 am by Jessica Perry
In determining that 7-Eleven properly classified the franchisees as independent contractors, the court applied the three-prong test outlined by the California Supreme Court in Martinez v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:48 am by SHG
§ 924(c), plus the Supreme Court’s uncharitable decision in Deal v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 10:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
C 11–6342 PJH, 2012 WL 5873585 (N.D. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top Online intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]