Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 4321 - 4340 of 41,720
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2024, 12:21 pm by Unknown
(Arm of the Tribe; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) State of Alaska v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:18 pm
    Last month, Judge Freedman in Alameda County Superior Court ruled that the State was required to list all the chemicals identified by reference in Labor Code sections 6382(b)(1) and 6382(d). [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 4:17 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RMM v HW & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1467 (17 December 2010) Quinn v CC Automotive Group Ltd (t/a Carcraft) [2010] EWCA Civ 1412 (16 December 2010) Warren v Calzaghe [2010] EWCA Civ 1447 (16 December 2010) Southern Cross Healthcare Co Ltd v Perkins & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1442 (16 December 2010) Benedetti v Sawiris & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1427 (16 December 2010) Revenue and Customs v Blue Sphere Global Ltd… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is undisputed that the defendants failed to submit such "documentary evidence" when they filed the underlying claim in the Court of Claims and that the underlying claim was dismissed based on that pleading defect (Reed v State of New York, [*2]78 NY2d 1, 7; Gioeli v State of New York, 39 AD3d 815; Piccarreto v State of New York, 144 AD2d 920, 921; Heiss v State of New York, 143 AD2d 67, 69; Ivey v… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 2:34 am
Sixth Circuit SEAL.gif Another circuit finds a statement against interest under FRE 804(b)(3) is non-testimonial; Cooperating witness's tape recording of co-defendant bragging to other inmates about his and the defendant's role in the charged robbery was non-testimonial because "a reasonable person in the declarant's [co-defendant's] position" would not anticipate his statement being used against the defendant in investigating and prosecuting… [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
McManus, in which the Justices are considering whether a district judge can dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) without referring the case for consideration by a three-judge panel. [read post]