Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 4321 - 4340
of 15,305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2019, 3:54 am
Flair Airlines, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 12:11 pm
After reviewing a number of cases, the court determined it did have jurisdiction under the province’s Children’s Law Reform Act, which states 28 (1) The court to which an application is made under section 21, (a) by order may grant the custody of or access to the child to one or more persons; (b) by order may determine any aspect of the incidents of the right to custody or access; and (c) may make such additional order as the… [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 12:11 pm
After reviewing a number of cases, the court determined it did have jurisdiction under the province’s Children’s Law Reform Act, which states 28 (1) The court to which an application is made under section 21, (a) by order may grant the custody of or access to the child to one or more persons; (b) by order may determine any aspect of the incidents of the right to custody or access; and (c) may make such additional order as the… [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
Kraft Food Group Brands LLC that reversed the Federal Circuit and said that 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) remains the only applicable patent venue statute, that 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) did not modify or amend 1400(b) or the Court’s 1957 ruling in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
Kraft Food Group Brands LLC that reversed the Federal Circuit and said that 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) remains the only applicable patent venue statute, that 28 U.S.C. 1391(c) did not modify or amend 1400(b) or the Court’s 1957 ruling in Fourco Glass Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
A six-decade-old U.S. economic embargo on Cuba has also remained officially intact.With Monday’s announcement, the administration made clear that it was not only acting because of what the State Department official called “the Cuban state’s repression of its own people” but also to send a message about Havana’s role in Venezuela. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 11:24 pm
A new decision of the Court of Justice of the EU, C-497/17, Oeuvre d’assistance aux bêtes d’abattoirs (OABA) v Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation and Others delivered on February 26, 2019, clarified that an organic production logo of the EU may not be placed on meat derived from animals that have been slaughtered in accordance with religious rites if not first being stunned. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Furthermore, in deciding the question of whether a bona fide emergency declaration has been made, the decision last spring in Trump v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In this regard, the threshold for distinctiveness is not dependent on the public’s level of attention (Smart Technologies v OHIM, C‑311/11 P).Lack of distinctive character of the mark applied forAs regards the issue of distinctive character, the applicant maintained that the relevant public would perceive the mark as the letter ‘v’ for ‘vericiguat’ rather than a representation of a heart. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
(Report of the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights 19 Dec. 2018)The Report may be accessed HERE in multiple languages: HRC 40th 19/12/2018A/HRC/40/57 Guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms - Report of the Independent Expert on the… [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm
O’Keeffe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
The Appeal In unanimous decision authored by Judge Sean C. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Supreme Court precedent, and with precedent from appellate courts in other states. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:25 pm
-signed international free trade agreements; and (4) products covered by other FAR and DFARS exceptions to the BAA, including: (i) the public interest (FAR 25.103(a)); (ii) domestic non-availability determinations (FAR 25.103(b)); (iii) where the government would pay an unreasonably high cost for the domestic end product (FAR 25.103(c)); (iv) commissary resale (FAR 25.103(d)); and (v) purchases of commercial information technology (FAR 25.103(e)). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:24 am
City of Irvine (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1110 (“Royalty”) and Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:07 am
Here's what Michelle writes:"The Review Board of the United States Copyright Office has affirmed a decision of the Registration Program to deny registration for Cartagz, Inc.'s attempt to register a text claim in a work. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:55 am
Cartagz requested pursuant to 37 CFR 202.5(c) that the Office reconsider its refusal a second time, on the basis that the Office had applied a higher creativity standard than warranted by copyright law, that following Harcourt, Brace & World Inc. v Graphic Controls Corp 329 F. [read post]
