Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 18,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2012, 10:45 am
The Maryland Supreme Court denied a negligence claim against the state for serving a peanut butter sandwich to an allergic child through the free lunch program. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:36 am
Katzman v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
In Bellotti v. [read post]
Parents Didn't Commit Child Neglect For Slapping Teen and Taking Her Paycheck, Says NJ Supreme Court
10 Feb 2011, 7:06 am
New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:28 am
” It is well established in cases from Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:15 am
Cottom, but a DOJ spokesman now says this case, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 11:20 pm
If a right is vested in a child before 1 July 2007, the age of majority of the child is 21 years (not 18 years), including for prescription purposes. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 7:18 am
He took custody when she was 27 months old, as the court ruled the Indian Child Welfare Act preempts state law. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:09 am
Woodland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:44 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 2:22 pm
(Indian Child Welfare Act) State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:44 pm
Child pornography is the new crack cocaine.By that, I don't mean it's incredibly addictive. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:44 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:18 am
Webb v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:35 am
In The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor v TLU & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 2217 the Court of Appeal, was asked to review one aspect of Mr Justice Mitting’s decision in TLT & Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2016] EWHC 2217 (QB). [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:42 pm
The Sixth Circuit provides an interesting read this morning in US v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:38 am
Griffith v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:38 pm
State - Here, the CCA held that Billodeau should've been allowed to question the complainant in an aggravated sexual assault of a child case about threats to falsely accuse his neighbors of molesting him even though the threats ocurred after the charged offense. [read post]
