Search for: "State v. Davi"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 5,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2019, 2:49 am
Among the significant opinions he authored was United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
In Meacham v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Symposium on Jed Stiglitz’s “The Reasoning State”: Jed Stiglitz’s book The Reasoning State makes the case that the legislature commits problems to the administrative state, which attains its legitimacy through reasoning and competition. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 8:27 am
During oral argument in 2015 in Davis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 3:51 pm
The case was State Farm v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 10:23 am
In Davis v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:21 am
First Nat’l State Bank of N.J., 87 N.J. 163, 175-76 (1981). [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
Davis. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
On rebuttal, the State sought to introduce portions of Leffew's statement to police that it was Hernandez that strangled Fernandez under Rule 806, which allows the impeachment of hearsay with other hearsay.The majority held that though this statement was clearly testimonial under Crawford and Davis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Davis L. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 10:33 am
Her recent vote in Department of State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am
Davis & Hunter R. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 5:36 pm
Damages were assessed, following a default judgment, in the sum of £75,000 On 12 March 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Davies v Carter. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:30 am
Davis-Stirling states a 30-90 day window prior to the start of the fiscal year. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:19 am
He wondered why, if a state treated a matter as within a hearsay exception, the Confrontation Clause should require exclusion.There was some irony here, because Justice Breyer’s concurrence in Lilly v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am
The procedure in that case, Burnham v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:26 pm
Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), 8 C.F.R. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm
Related Issues: Free SpeechInternationalRelated Cases: Kazakhstan v. [read post]
