Search for: "State v. Davis" Results 4321 - 4340 of 5,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Last night it was Brian Davis in Oklahoma. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
 CVSG: 5/18/2023 (relisted after the June 22 conference) Davis v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am by JURIST Staff
Furthermore, it was held in Davis v United States (8th Cir. 1917) that a public trial is broadly defined as a trial at which the public is free to attend. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
Judge Henderson’s dissent and my forthcoming UC Davis paper reflect this functional approach. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am by Kiran Bhat
Court for the Northern Dist. of Texas and Davis v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Woodill v Parke Davis & Co., 402 N.E.2d 194 (Ill. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:50 am by Randall Hodgkinson
  Improper instructions (aiding and abetting)State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts The trial in the case of Piepenbrock v London School of Economics was heard by Nicola Davies J on 23, 24 and 27 July 2018. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, November 12, 2008 Davie v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm by Danny O'Brien
Related Issues: Free SpeechInternationalRelated Cases: Kazakhstan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]