Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
” Both the district court and the 9th Circuit concluded that the deputies could be held liable under the provocation doctrine. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 10:09 pm
United States, in which the court declared Johnson to be retroactive, and on Montgomery v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:05 pm
County of Sonoma (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1234, and also transferring the matter back to the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Div. 1) for reconsideration in light of Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
“The Guild’s arguments ... are the same as those this Court has rejected time and again,” wrote Assistant United States Attorney. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:46 pm
United States, in which the court declared Johnson to be retroactive, and on Montgomery v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:00 am
This tendency aligns with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bowen v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:10 am
On appeal, the court first stated the scope of judicial review for an arbitral award is extremely narrow. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:31 pm
The lawsuits – one filed by a coalition of twenty-one states (State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:52 pm
However, the district court looked to the Supreme Court’s 1985 holding in Garcia v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 5:56 am
The district court had affirmed the ruling. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:06 am
’ United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 6:45 am
” Court steps in The district court first issued an injunction to temporarily halt the rule. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:38 pm
The district court granted the insurer’s summary judgment motion. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:18 pm
District Court Judge S. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 11:19 am
Amdocs v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
” (Quoting County of Inyo v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:43 am
Counsel presented case law that the ordinary meaning of the words and legislative history supported a broad interpretation of the phrase (Hobbs v Winchester Corpn [1910] 2 KB 471, Place v Rawtenstall Corpn (1916) 86 LJKB 90, Clayton v Sale Urban District Council [1926] 1 KB 415 and Neath Rural District Council v Williams [1951] 1 KB 115). [read post]
