Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 4321 - 4340 of 9,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am by Ben
Courthouse News says "Underscoring the bizarre nature of the proceedings, no attorneys for Equustek Solutions or the Canadian court system showed up, allowing Caruso to state her case to U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 12:04 pm by J.P. Vogel and Patrick Kelly
Early involvement allows you to shape the conversation from the outset, rather than reacting to proposals after they’ve gained momentum. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:51 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
  Wouldn’t there be efficiencies to be gained in avoiding duplicative litigation in multiple jurisdictions? [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:08 am
Importantly, the account here not only answers Professor Sunstein's challenge, but also promises to makes sense of the Supreme Court's recent and somewhat puzzling holding in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am by Terry Hart
(I briefly discussed this idea in More on Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons.) [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:06 am by Broc Romanek
Last month, I blogged about how the Delaware legislature was barreling towards passing legislation to reverse the impact of the ATP Tour v. [read post]