Search for: "State v. M. C. M." Results 4321 - 4340 of 6,604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
  Maybe I'm crazy, but I think a proper analysis is in order, don't you? [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:59 am
German epidemiologists initially thought including sprouts would only create false positives in case/control studies because sprouts, in general, are so common a food item.A CDC-FDA-state investigation of a similar outbreak here in the United States would focus more quickly on sprouts given the long history of sprout outbreaks. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The ground for opposition under A 100(c) therefore does not prejudice the maintenance of a European patent which includes such a feature. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
” The court also instructed the parties that “[m]aking an adverse claim to a line item of property is not contemplated in year’s support. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 2:13 am by Alison Rowe
   The Cohan Rule is named for the great American composer/lyricist, George M. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:18 pm by Scott Calvert
Civil Code section 3428, subdivision (c) states that “[h]ealth care service plans … are not health care providers under any provision of law, including, but not limited to … Section[] … 425.13 … of the Code of Civil Procedure. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:27 am by Rick
In some cases, I’m defending the alleged abuser; in others, I’m providing legal advice to the “victim” who wishes not to testify; in still others, it’s a more philosophical exercise — arguing the issue with ignoramuses on the Internet. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:12 pm by WSLL
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:55 am by Tatiana Sinodinou
The ECJ’s rulings in the Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v Telefónica de España SAU (case 275/06) and LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH v Tele2 Telecommunication GmbH (case C-557/07)  confirmed the necessity to balance data protection and IPR under the light of the principle of proportionality, but it did not provide any clear guidance as regards the role of intermediaries in the… [read post]