Search for: "Stephens v. State"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 6,328
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2017, 2:55 am
“In my view, the Court’s decision in FCC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:55 am
“In my view, the Court’s decision in FCC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:50 am
Roberts Jr. and Justices Stephen G. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 11:12 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 7:23 pm
However, in the landmark case of Skov v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:16 pm
However, in the landmark case of Skov v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:38 am
A second Court case, Reichle v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
Georgia, and states could no longer put people to death, until the Supremes changed their mind in Gregg v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 8:39 am
Arkansas and Kitzmiller v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:43 am
United States, No. 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/840393.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
” In NAACP v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:53 pm
It was held in Williams v New York State and Ahlers v New York State Division of Parole that the imposition of a special parole condition is discretionary in nature and ordinarily beyond judicial review as long as it is made in accordance with law and no positive statutory requirement is violated. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:42 pm
It was held in Williams v New York State and Ahlers v New York State Division of Parole that the imposition of a special parole condition is discretionary in nature and ordinarily beyond judicial review as long as it is made in accordance with law and no positive statutory requirement is violated. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:38 pm
Justices Stephen G. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
Academic freedom -- United States ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND THE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY / ERIC BARENDT Oxford; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub., 2010 K3755 .B37 2010 See Catalog Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- United States AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW AND POLICY / WILLIAM M. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:10 pm
This may significantly impact on privacy laws across all Europe’s contracting states. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:53 am
It was, for a time, purely “metaphysical,” as Justice Stephen G. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
3rd, in striking down the ACA’s conditioning continued participation in the Medicaid program on a state’s acceptance of the ACA’s expansion of that program, Roberts, for the first time in history, invoked a doctrine of unconstitutional “coercion” to invalidate a federal law – and, not insignificantly, drawing support from progressive justices Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan, making for a 7-2 majority. [read post]
