Search for: "United States v. David" Results 4321 - 4340 of 6,867
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2012, 10:39 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012), the case in which the Federal Circuit held that flooding caused by the Corps of Engineers was only temporary, and did not result in a compensable taking merely because it eventually stopped, and "at most created tort liablity. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 11:16 am by David Kopel
L. 294 (2000) (cited in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:17 pm by Ilya Somin
United States (1935), which invalidated the National Industrial Recovery Act, the most sweeping effort at economic central planning in all of American history. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
#startups nyc london…http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2291836513200414722012-07-28 11:42:20 HarvardLaw74: Krista Cox 8 case citation amicus brief in Wiley First Sale case #copyright…quite good [Can a book publisher sell a book at 50 percent off overseas and prevent its import back the United States for a second sale? [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Supreme Court Asked to Hear Proposition 8 Case Plaintiffs’ Attorneys: We are ready to defend our victories before the Supreme Court Washington, DC – Today, the proponents of California’s Proposition 8 asked the United States Supreme Court to review the landmark federal appeals court ruling in Perry v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:57 pm by DougW
John Larimer, United States Navy cryptologist. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:08 am by Richard Renner
Kohn and I are filing a "friend of the court" brief urging the United States Supreme Court to accept review of, and reverse, the First Circuit's decision in Lawson v. [read post]