Search for: "United States v. Pauling"
Results 4321 - 4340
of 4,493
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
The justices have already agreed to hear a similar case, Riegel v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 9:02 am
Per Mwani v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 8:05 am
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; and Paul S. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Walton, Judge, The United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaClosing remarks4:15-4:30 p.m. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:21 pm
Solicitor General Paul D. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:12 am
In one case, Riegel v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
., v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 1:59 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
The statute can survive strict scrutiny only if it is "narrowly tailored to promote a compelling government interest," United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Would Brown v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:38 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeAppeals Subject to 'Anders' Motion Require §3553(c)(2) Statement of Reasons for Sentence With Judgment
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 4:40 pm
Moussaoui v. the United States Transcripts of the hearing in which Zacarias Moussaoui attempted to plead guilty (PDF), the hearing (PDF) at which he did, and the trial session at which he testified. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:16 pm
Md. 2007), United States Magistrate Judge Paul W. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 9:08 am
Supreme Court accepted certiorari in the case of Kimbrough v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:39 am
May 25, 2006).On remand, the district court appointed Paul Rice, a law professor and the author of a leading attorney-client privilege treatise, to conduct the in camera review as a special master. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
" Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 11:24 am
Paul W. [read post]
