Search for: "A B C Insurance"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 5,820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
In addition legal practitioners are required to have compulsory professional indemnity insurance. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 4:51 pm
What’s more, their study suggests that many class action notices do not even meet the basic requirements set forth expressly in FRCP 23(c)(2)(B). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:01 am
But it certified a Rule 23(b)(2) class of "all State Farm policyholders who filed insurance claims for damage resulting from the April 2006 hailstorm and did not receive 'an entirely new roof.'" Id. at *7. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
(ii) SINGLE MEMBER LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY - If the investor fund is a single member limited liability company that is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner, the credit allowed under subsection (a) may be claimed by such limited liability company's owner, if such owner is a person subject to the tax under this title. (4) EXCLUSION - The term “qualified investor” does not include -- (A) a person controlling at least 50 percent of the qualified small business entity,… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:49 pm
The following purposes are prescribed: (a) soliciting a donation from a member of a company; (b) soliciting a member of a company by a person who is authorised to assume or use the word stockbroker or sharebroker in accordance with section 923B of the Act; (c) gathering information about the personal wealth of a member of a company; (d) making an offer or invitation to which Division 5A of Part 7.9 of the Act applies. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:31 pm
B. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
L. 147-150 (2010).CELL TOWERS.Foster, Robert B. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:17 am
According to the interim rules, which took effect August 27, 2010, health plans must cover emergency services without requiring pre-authorization, and they must reimburse the provider the greater of (a) the median in-network rate, (b) the usual and customary rate, calculated using the plan's formula, or (c) the Medicare rate. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:06 am
In the trilogy and in other cases upon which JJM relies, Party A covenanted to insure, or in fact insured, with Party B paying the insurance premiums, and Party B sought exoneration from responsibility for damage covered by the insurance. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
The survivor program is the “secondary payor” to any applicable public or private health insurance for the conditions that are not work-related. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:34 pm
B. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:21 pm
The annuity must conform to Maryland and Federal law (a) It must be irrevocable (b) You must be guaranteed at least what you paid into the annuity over the balance of your life expectancy (c) If you purchase an annuity with a term certain, it must be shorter than your actuarial life expectancy. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:05 pm
(c) The use of CFAs is not confined to Claimants, however. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:45 am
That’s what the medical evidence shows.The more I documentation I read, the more I believe that Client B is trying to commit insurance fraud.Client C is ducking my phone calls and Client D has called far too often with nothing new to report to him.Client E just doesn't get that her case is not as important as she thinks it is.And it’s not just clients that are making this day worse...Attorney 1 is an asshole that refuses to cede his “moral high… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:19 am
He examined an insurance adjuster that worked for the Defendant. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:26 am
-Rose C. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 5:38 am
Under both the South Carolina and Federal Rule of Evidence 611(c), “Ordinarily leading questions should be permitted on cross-examination. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:40 am
If at any time during this period the party is not eligible to maintain that coverage, the party shall, at the party's sole expense, provide and maintain health and medical insurance coverage that is comparable to the existing health and medical insurance coverage to the extent it is available. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:17 pm
It is unclear whether this language, if adopted, would a) effectively prevent any consumer protection claim from being pursued on a class basis because all consumer protection claims would require individual proof of injury, b) be interpreted only as a threshold matter to insure that the class representative (but not absent class members) has standing before the case is allowed to proceed, or c) somehow introduce a new requirement of… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:12 am
ERISA § 514(b)(2)(A). [read post]
