Search for: "Antonin Scalia"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 6,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 2:00 am
When considering the mysteries of the legislature’s having deemed of the Commission to be in the executive branch for at least some purposes while removing it from the control of the executive branch, I am reminded of Justice Antonin Scalia’s dissent in Mistretta v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:14 am
Antonin I. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia left little doubt that he would vote to uphold Section 2(B); he agreed that the federal government has the authority to say who is allowed to stay in the United States, but he was downright scornful of the idea that Arizona was helpless to do anything about someone who was, under the rules created by the federal government, there illegally. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 12:26 pm
by Jeremy Leaming For what feels like decades, reporters, pundits, and ideologues, mostly on the right, but some on the left, have lauded Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia for his wit, pointed oral argument questioning and allegedly brilliant writing. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:00 am
Justices Antonin Scalia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Samuel Alito Jr. were also on hand for the wine-and-finger-food event. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:25 am
One of Justice Antonin Scalia’s quips may tip the direction of the Court: "If, in fact, somebody who does not belong in this country is in Arizona, Arizona has no power? [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:29 pm
Solicitor General Donald Verrilli had another rough day in front of the Supreme Court, this time arguing the Arizona immigration law… Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Antonin Scalia, Arizona, Arizona Immigration Law, Arizona v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:30 pm
It did not take long for Justice Antonin Scalia to side with Arizona, and it was not much later that Chief Justice John G. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:03 am
” Justice Antonin Scalia asked. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
Justice Antonin Scalia issued an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:04 am
Justice Clarence Thomas issued an opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Antonin Scalia joined. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:15 am
” Justice Antonin Scalia has warned: “A society that adopts a bill of rights is skeptical that ‘evolving standards of decency’ always ‘mark progress,’ and that societies always ‘mature,’ as opposed to rot. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:45 am
” Justice Antonin Scalia has warned: “A society that adopts a bill of rights is skeptical that ‘evolving standards of decency’ always ‘mark progress,’ and that societies always ‘mature,’ as opposed to rot. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
At 10 a.m. next Wednesday, in the final scheduled hearing of the Supreme Court’s current Term, the Justices move to sort out the sometimes conflicting roles of national and state governments in controlling the lives of non-citizens living illegally in the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:05 pm
Four justices - Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia - will be 74 or older come January. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:43 am
Justice Antonin Scalia picked up on the point. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
Antonin Scalia: “Las cámaras en la Suprema Corte podrían, realmente educar a la gente, pero también podrían maleducar y desinformar”. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Justice Antonin Scalia did not join one section of the Court's opinion. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:32 am
” Well, little Johnny might not be aware of it, but Antonin Scalia and several justices sure were, and they spent the first twenty minutes of the oral argument using the defendants’ lawyers as punching bags, asking them repeatedly where they could find anything in the Fair Sentencing Act which “expressly” provides that it’s to be applied retroactively. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:26 am
” The bill would also overturn a unanimous Supreme Court decision, where the Court, in an opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, concluded that the Clean Air Act was clear in its requirement that health-based air quality standards be based solely on health science. [read post]
