Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 4341 - 4360 of 21,831
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2020, 2:40 pm by Matt Gluck
Nathaniel Sobel discussed the recent developments in the Trump v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm by Erin Napoleon
To justify the removal of Taney’s bust, the bill declares that: While sitting in the United States Capitol, the Supreme Court issued the infamous Dred Scott v Sanford decision on March 6, 1857. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am by Jan von Hein
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm by Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer
If elected, candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden has stated that he would not end DACA, and instead would send a bill to Congress “on [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 1:38 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Howard County, Maryland has become the first jurisdiction in the state and one of few places in the country to pass a mandatory “bird-friendly design” law for new construction of privately owned buildings. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm by Daphne Keller
Bills like FOSTA and EARN IT proclaimed important goals, but did not lay out a system to actually achieve them. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm by Guest Blogger
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]