Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 13,859
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2010, 3:19 am
Payment of hazardous duty pay while receiving GML Section 207-c benefitsTown of Carmel v PERB, Appellate Division, 246 A.D.2d 791Prior to January 1995, Town of Carmel police officers assigned to “light duty” pursuant to Section 207-c of the General Municipal Law performed desk duty. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
In a recent blog post, David Langham, Deputy Chief Judge of Compensation Claims for the Florida Office of Judges of Compensation Claims and Division of Administrative Hearings provides an analysis of recent developments. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In an unreported August 1, 2011 ruling in National Credit Union Administration v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:24 am
Hyatt Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:30 pm
In Winter v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 1:25 pm
Faced with the problem of how to provide legal counsel to those who cannot afford to hire their own attorney after Gideon v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 8:18 pm
Probably the only really note worthy decision out of the First Circuit with regard to ERISA while I was out of the office is this one here, in Kouvchinov v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:29 am
By basing its policies on this shakier legal foundation, Goldsmith argues, the administration created a backlash that will leave a lingering mistrust of executive power in Congress and the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
The DC Court also noted that the NLRB was not entitled to Chevron deference when it was interpreting the FVRA and neither was the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel, whose 1999 interpretation of the 1998 statue coincided with the NLRB ’s views. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:10 pm
., v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 10:15 pm
Circuit vacated the administrative decision in Mobil Pipe Line Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 8:39 am
In Corey v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court, insofar as to issues it appealed, denied a petition to compel the New York City Department of Citywide Administration [DCAS] to disclose records requested by the Freedom Foundation [Foundation] pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL (Public Officers Law §84 et seq)], and dismissed the proceeding Foundation had brought pursuant to CPLR Article 78. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court, insofar as to issues it appealed, denied a petition to compel the New York City Department of Citywide Administration [DCAS] to disclose records requested by the Freedom Foundation [Foundation] pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law [FOIL (Public Officers Law §84 et seq)], and dismissed the proceeding Foundation had brought pursuant to CPLR Article 78. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 12:27 pm
Our duties have regularly included representation before Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) presiding out of the Western, Southern, Midwestern and Mid-Atlantic Field Offices of the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:26 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in Mistretta v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 9:50 pm
Fiacco v. [read post]
3 Jul 2022, 1:41 pm
Fowler v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:44 am
Such is not the case in administrative disciplinary actions where the hearing officer or arbitrator is not bound by the formal rules of evidence.Recent examples of the approval of the use of computer, or computer related, evidence to find an employee guilty of administrative disciplinary charges include:Matter of Leo Gustafson v Town of N. [read post]
