Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 32,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2019, 2:37 am
In re Outdoorlink, Inc., Serial Nos. 85935503 and 85935508 (July 8, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
18 May 2015, 6:44 am
Comments received about the 2014 proposed exemption orders led to amendment of the following provisions: (1) “issuer group” definition and “participating jurisdictions” list; (2) offering limits; (3) funding portal head office and residence conditions for directors, officers, promoters and control persons; (4) 48-hour right to withdraw investment; (5) funding portal’s handling of purchaser funds; (6) funding portal’s books and records; (7) funding… [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:53 pm
NHAI [Civil Appeal No. 4779/2019 dt. 8 May 2019] is significant for several reasons and one of the important reasons is because it lays down the contours of setting aside arbitral awards on the grounds of public policy and patent illegality post the 2015 amendments. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 11:40 am
It was originally scheduled for tomorrow (March 1, 2013). [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 8:22 pm
The USCIS Hague interim rule, therefore, does not apply to a case in which the adoption was already completed before April 1, 2008. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 1:48 pm
The note to rule 203-1 states that an adviser that does not have to deliver a brochure to any clients does not have to prepare or file a brochure with the Commission. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Art. 1 of the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
But, its benchers should operate as does the Cabinet of an elected government, maximizing its use of all of the expertise and capacities of its civil service. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
ENTERED: April 18, 2023 Footnotes Footnote 1: Defendants John/Jane Does I-XX have not appeared in this action or sought representation from the Attorney General. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 5:50 am
any setoff of any debt owed to the debtor that arose before the filing of the petition 8. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:19 pm
State of Haryana, (2003) 8 SCC 60; Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 5:19 pm
State of Haryana, (2003) 8 SCC 60; Jindal Stainless Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
ENTERED: April 18, 2023 Footnotes Footnote 1: Defendants John/Jane Does I-XX have not appeared in this action or sought representation from the Attorney General. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:11 am
Sept. 8, 2015), which found no jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:17 am
After an appeal to the Higher Regional Courts of Munich and Hamburg, the cases reached the BGH.At the core of all this is the question of when the platforms YouTube and Uploaded themselves perform an act of communication or making available to the public under the German equivalent of Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive.The CJEU held that a platform operator does perform an own communication to the public when it does not limit itself to providing physical facilities… [read post]
21 May 2017, 6:45 pm
The CTP right, whose modern roots can be found in Article 8 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty, is being buffeted by the fast-moving currents of the digital age. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 3:38 am
Rather, revocation 11 proceedings may be brought before the UPC even if an opposition before the EPO is pending, see Art. 33 (8), (10) UPCA. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 12:07 pm
The test of whether the claim is directed to a judicial exception asks whether the claim recites a judicial exception (Prong 1) and whether the claim also does not recite additional elements that integrate the judicial exception into a practical application (Prong 2). [read post]
28 May 2017, 10:14 am
Organic Roasted Salted Cashews UPC 8-10111-01035-1 Best By 4/28/18, Lot 11817-L2 [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
Supreme Court this week ruled Congress has the authority to restore copyright protection to foreign works previously in the public domain without running afoul of the Constitution's Progress Clause (Art. 1, Sec. 8, Clause 8) [see "TUOL" post 3/8/11].Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in Golan v. [read post]
