Search for: "Doe VI " Results 4341 - 4360 of 5,650
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
(2) In such a case, the Member States are required, in transposing Directives 2006/115 and 92/100, to provide for a right to equitable remuneration vis-à-vis the hotel or guesthouse operator even if the radio and television broadcasters have already paid equitable remuneration for the use of the phonograms in their broadcasts [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 12:04 pm by admin
  Further more, a pardon is only available to prevent removal on those grounds specifically named in INA(a)(2)(A)(vi) and does not cover any other deportable ground such as crimes relating to a controlled substance that are a part of INA §237(a)(2)(B). [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 8:52 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Meena Vijay Khetan & Ors. (1999) 5 SCC 651; Chiranjit Shrilal Goenka v Jasjit Singh (1993) 2 SCC 507.An agreement to sell or an agreement to mortgage does not involve a transfer of a right in rem but is in the nature of a right in personam. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 8:52 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Meena Vijay Khetan & Ors. (1999) 5 SCC 651; Chiranjit Shrilal Goenka v Jasjit Singh (1993) 2 SCC 507.An agreement to sell or an agreement to mortgage does not involve a transfer of a right in rem but is in the nature of a right in personam. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, novelty of the claimed apparatus vis-à-vis these documents is acknowledged.Should you wish to download the whole decision, just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm by Stephen Wermiel
  He described Vermont’s regulation as a reasonable effort to regulate commercial activity, one that does not impose any significant burden on free speech. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:34 pm by The Legal Blog
State of UP, have discussed the law relating to the contempt of court vis-a-vis misbehavior / violent behavior against judicial officers. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Jim Gerl
Fairfax County Sch Bd 553 F.3d 315, 51 IDELR 148 (4th Cir 1/14/09).Related articlesBack To The Future: Special Education Law 101 (specialeducationlawblog.blogspot.com) Does FAPE trump LRE? [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:35 pm by Rick Hills
But -- as Justice Thomas himself has frequently complained -- the Court does not really enforce those limits according to the terms of the original compact. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am by FDABlog HPM
VI, cl. 2—cannot be read to permit an approach to pre-emption that renders conflict pre-emption all but meaningless. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:10 am
 - May 20, 2011Sony Data Breach Part VI: Four Attacks Since April - May 24, 2011 var addthis_pub="blogengineextensionaddthis"; [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:27 am by Joe Wallin
., “qualifying portfolio companies,” which are discussed below) and at least 80 percent of each company’s securities owned by the fund were acquired directly from the qualifying portfolio company; (ii) directly, or through its investment advisers, offers or provides significant managerial assistance to, or controls, the qualifying portfolio company; (iii) does not borrow or otherwise incur leverage (other than limited short term borrowing); (iv) does not offer its… [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:22 am by WSLL
However, this case does not involve a special proceeding. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:19 am by Steve Vladeck
McHugh creates a far more serious tension with that Supreme Court decision than anything the Court of Appeals has held thus far vis-a-vis Guantanamo, and in a manner that was completely unecessary to reach the same holding. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:33 am by Dianne Saxe
For routine matters, though, regulated businesses actually have very little privacy, or rights to silence, vis-à-vis their regulators. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Also, at Balkinization, Sandy Levinson writes a post titled Life In A Constitutional Dictatorship: It is now crystal clear that Obama does not represent a true repudiation of the Bush Administration, but, rather, a (somewhat) kindler and gentler version of its claims vis-a-vis presidential power and what is defined by the White House as "national security. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The new Treaty does not set forth a specific burden of proof for requests to the United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:36 am by Benjamin Wittes
And it clarifies that this detention authority does not apply to U.S. citizens or lawful residents for “conduct taking place within the United States except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States”–thus making clear that it is not trying to change the status quo vis a vis folks like Jose Padilla. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE VI If the person sought should be under examination or under punishment in the territory of the requested Party for any other offense, his extradition shall be deferred until the conclusion of the trial and the full execution of any punishment awarded to him. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:33 am
      The notary does not verify the zoning/land use of the property and its compatibility with the buyer's specific project. 5. [read post]