Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 9,558
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 6:48 pm
The specification does not attribute any movement of the guard to the hinged arm of the safety needle. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:11 am
What does $5,000,000 signify? [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
HOW DOES A DEFENDANT ESTABLISH REMOVAL IS WARRANTED? [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:03 pm
The Rosenthal-Burke paper does not contest this line of thinking.Second, these proposals (and others) reflect the premise that flow-through taxation of entities, so that their positive net returns are taxed directly to the owners at the owners' tax rates, is the ideal. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
(b) REVIEW AND ADJUSTMENT.- (1) INITIAL REVIEW AND ADJUSTMENT. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 12:18 pm
If an employee meets this threshold, they must accrue one (1) hour of PL and one (1) hour of PSL for every 35 hours worked. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 5:36 am
Avg processing time 35 days. 9:07 US has supported South Korean efforts in Kaesong Industrial Complex in the North through limited licensing 9:09 North Korea stats -- 9 applications, 1, approved, 1 denied, 7 RWA'd (all of the RWA's were related). 14 day average processing time. 9:13 Syria -- 249 applications, 169 of which were approved (no denial/RWA breakdown provided). [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
The case presents the following questions: 1) Does Romney have standing? [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:35 am
” Furthermore, at step two of the Alice–Mayo framework, the Federal Circuit held that claim 1 does not involve an inventive concept “[b]ecause claim 1 is recited at a high level of generality and merely invokes well-understood, routine, conventional components to apply the abstract idea identified above”. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:00 am
Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 865, a majority of this panel would dismiss the appeal largely for the reasons of Dickson J.A., and Justices Karakatsanis and Brown would allow substantially for the reasons of Bennett J.A. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Further, the decision in R (on the application of S) v YP School (2003) EWCA Civ 1306, (2004) ELR 37 that the appropriate standard in deciding to uphold an exclusion was the criminal one was not robust authority in relation to the requirements of Article 6, and was also inconsistent with House of Lords authority, R(S), B (Children) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof), Re (2008) UKHL 35, (2009) 1 AC 11, and D, Re (2008) UKHL 33, (2008) 1 WLR 1499. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:45 am
B.J. 35, 38 (2002). [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:39 am
CMS has adopted a modifier that must be used beginning January 1, 2016 on claims for computed tomography (CT) services furnished using equipment that does not meet National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) dose standards (such as older, higher-dose scanners). [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:38 am
Consequently, the freedom of establishment precludes imposing the 1/30 rule where it is not established that the measure is suitable to ensure in a coherent and systematic manner that the stated objectives would be attained, and that it does not go beyond what is necessary to attain those objectives. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
That means that in order to be patentable the invention must meet the patent eligibility test in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
That means that in order to be patentable the invention must meet the patent eligibility test in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm
Eyre (1870) L.R. 6 Q.B. 1.] despite being tempered by subsequent case law) is complex to interpret and does not resemble (structurally or linguistically) modern choice-of-law rules. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 10:17 am
does that snide comment mean? [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
Code § 1491(a)(1) (2006). [read post]