Search for: "Federal, Inc."
Results 4341 - 4360
of 57,584
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
All the attorneys at the firm are admitted to the federal courts in Florida. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:20 am
In Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 6:46 am
First Santa Fe Insurance Services Inc. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:16 pm
Here are the materials in Fine Consulting, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 7:56 am
On July 13, 2023, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a mixed decision as to whether various sales and issuances of the XRP token (XRP) by Ripple Labs, Inc. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:03 am
In Genetic Veterinary Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm
Artesyn, 2008-1501, -1507, which represents Judge Love's first trial which has gone up to the Federal Circuit. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:55 pm
An Analysis of the Full Federal Court Decision in Facebook Inc v Australian Information Commissioner (Australian Bar Review, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2023, pp. 335-360) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:49 pm
Orange County - Mattress manufacturer Serta recently filed an action in a federal district court in Chicago, Illinois seeking a declaratory judgment that Serta has not infringed trademarks owned by Oleg Cassini, Inc. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:10 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:00 am
Dart Industries, Inc., 29 Cal.3d 462, 470 (1981)). [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:32 am
According to an article by the Associated Press, Medtronic's decision comes in response to pressure from federal legislators to disclose the information. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:27 am
But the recent split Federal Circuit panel decision in Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:20 pm
Teleflex Inc. as well as how it exercises its supervisory powers over the U.S. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:01 pm
HemCon, Inc. is one of those rare instances in this esoteric area of patent law where the Federal Circuit announced a new “wrinkle” on when “intervening rights” apply in reexamination. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:34 am
This program was sold as a way for employers to avoid withholding federal income taxes from wages. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
, Inc. et al, 09 Div. 4373 (SAS), where a Magistrate Judge of the Southern District of the United States Federal Court found that Gucci’s communications with its in-house counsel were not privileged because his status with the relevant bar was inactive. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 2:40 pm
An earlier blog commented on the Federal Court’s decision in Bodum USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
You will remember the MFS, Inc. jury verdict that found 4 PADEP employees in the NE Regional office liable for $6.5 million dollars for allegedly discriminating against MFS, Inc. and violating their civil rights. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:28 pm
If you do not like Seventh Circuit Judge Richard Posner, you will enjoy the Federal Circuit's slap-down of their colleague in Apple Inc. v. [read post]
