Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: D. R." Results 4341 - 4360 of 26,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2019, 5:34 am
If I'd realized that, I wouldn't have clicked "join. [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
This has implications not only for primary D&O insurers, but also for excess D&O insurers, because of the increased possibility that underlying layers will be eroded by defense expenses. [read post]
27 May 2019, 1:37 am by Grégoire Desrousseaux
Will it be a “non-dévolutif” appeal (i.e., which means that, no new exhibits or arguments compared to those used before the INPI can be raised before the Court of Appeal)? [read post]
26 May 2019, 6:39 am
Oh, really, I’d said, not altogether surprised. [read post]
26 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
24 May 2019, 6:01 am
Macey (Cornell Law School) and Jackson Salovaara, on Wednesday, May 22, 2019 Tags: Agency costs, Bankruptcy, Corporate liability, Debt, Debtor-creditor law, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Incentives, Liquidation, Public interest, Reorganizations, Securities regulation, Spinoffs Event-Driven Litigation Defense Posted by Julie G. [read post]
24 May 2019, 5:36 am
"Obama's Secretary of the Treasury, Jack Lew, announced the decision to put Tubman on the 20 in April 2016, when it was too late for him to make it happen, but he had reason to think he'd boxed the next administration in. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
Va. 2006), the district court rejected a First Amendment challenge to the prosecution of two American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) employees, who received illegally leaked information and then forwarded it to various journalists: [D]efendants here contend that the First Amendment bars Congress from punishing those persons, like defendants, without a special relationship to the government for the disclosure of [national defense information]. [read post]
23 May 2019, 1:50 pm by Kyle Orland
Perhaps the most interesting portion of the bill attempts to define so-called "pay-to-win" mechanics in games. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:44 pm by Jeff Berman
Actually an interesting point is when people will ask me sometimes about rankings and you know, when can I be for this particular term in this area and is one of the examples I use is this exactly were saying but you need to understand that it’s so personalized and one of those factors being where you’re searching from right then [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:44 pm by Jeff Berman
Actually an interesting point is when people will ask me sometimes about rankings and you know, when can I be for this particular term in this area and is one of the examples I use is this exactly were saying but you need to understand that it’s so personalized and one of those factors being where you’re searching from right then [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:25 am
I was interested enough to have blogged about it when I read about it a while back, but I didn't notice it was on, so I missed it. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
(summary judgment affirmed even though defendant filed controverting affidavit denying receipt of credit card agreement offered as summary judgment proof and denying agreement on interest rates).Wakefield v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:35 pm by Dennis Kennedy
I have no idea how to price that, what it might look like, or whether there is any interest. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The post Guest Post: The European Union Whistleblower Directive: Overdue Protective Shield appeared first on The D&O Diary. [read post]
22 May 2019, 12:32 pm by Scott McKeown
Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Chris Coons (D-DE), Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, and Representatvie Doug Collins (R-GA-9), Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, Hank Johnson (D-GA-4), Chairman of the House Judiciary Subommittee on Intellectual Property and the Courts, and Steve Stivers (R-OH-15) released a bipartisan, bicameral draft bill that would reform Section 101 of the Patent Act.… [read post]