Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: S. M., A CHILD" Results 4341 - 4360 of 5,730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm by Andrew Raff
"Child pornography and child exploitation have always raised strong public emotions. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 6:53 am by Pete Black
"Marketers Beware: No One’s On Glee‘s Website When Glee‘s on TV" http://j.mp/bBnPLa i'm outraged that america still has the death penaly, not that "Utah Execution Announced on Twitter" http://j.mp/cXLC5s google docs continues to get better and better ... [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm by familoo
What is not legitimate is to prioritise a parent's desire for recognition or affirmation over what is right for the child in any given case. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by familoo
What if you decide half way through a case that you can no longer support shared parenting for your child - will they leave you high and dry? [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 7:39 am by admin
Aging of the Population I am the center of my universe, and not just because I’m an egotist: my baby boom generation is remaking our society, and we’re likely to keep living a long time. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 7:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Gibbs, Deputy Mayor for Education and Community Development Dennis M. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 4:34 am by Susan Brenner
Here’s a summary of how the case arose: On August 3, 2006, pursuant to a search warrant issued earlier that day, Sergeant Thompson of the Bedford County Sheriff's Office and Investigator Arnold of the Pittsylvania County Sheriff's Office searched [David Midkiff’s] house for child pornography. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:57 am by ALeonard
Goldberg concluded that the film, rather than causing harm to Nicholas, "will serve this child's best interest. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
As I explained in that earlier post, § 3509(m) creates an exception that applies in child pornography prosecutions. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm by David Harlow
James ("Tex") Sensenbrenner's (R-WI) apparent conflict of interest in dealing with the BP oil spill. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:08 am by alexkorotkin
 The mother’s behavior included the following: “Plaintiff intentionally scheduled their childs (N. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:27 pm by Gregory Forman
 South Carolina Rule of Professional Conduct 1.8(m) states: A lawyer shall not have sexual relations with a client when the client is in a vulnerable condition or is otherwise subject to the control or undue influence of the lawyer, when such relations could have a harmful or prejudicial effect upon the interests of the client, or when sexual relations might adversely effect the lawyer’s representation of the client. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:38 pm by Jim Gerl
The strong purpose of providing children with a disability with a free and appropriate public education was paramount in the reasoning of the court in Burlington, Carter and this case.In perhaps the strongest statement in the majority opinion, the Court states that immunizing a school district's refusal to find a child eligible "... no matter how compelling the child's need... would produce a rule bordering on the irrational. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:05 pm by John Culhane
In addition to the inherent bias in self-reporting that’s well-known to epidemiologists, this particular report seems particularly susceptible to such bias: these women likely have at least some interest (perhaps greater than parents in the “normative sample”) in seeing their kids as happy and well-adjusted. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:02 pm by Adam Thierer
  I’m not so sure, although it’s hard to find a metric to compare them in an analytically rigorous fashion. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:10 am by Liz Kurtz
"I'm expected to be a full-time lawyer, and it doesn't occur to them that I'm also a full-time mother. [read post]