Search for: "In Interest of Jones"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 7,325
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 2:20 pm
Jones, Antoine Jones, his case? [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
Circuit Court ruling that Jones’s Fourth Amendment rights had been violated. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
The "majority" opinion of Justice Scalia held that the police placement of a GPS tracking device on Jones' car, and its subsequent month-long use of that device to track his every movement, amounted to a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment -- and thus required probable cause and a warrant -- because it invaded the property interest of Jones. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
As a result, I think that although the government lost Jones 9-0, it did far better than everyone has recognized so far. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:32 pm
For popular media, here are a few links with interesting commentary: NYT, The Atlantic, Wired, and Politico. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 12:20 pm
Jones, the GPS-tracking case. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:22 am
Fourth Amendment cases are supposed to have cool and interesting names (e.g. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:59 am
Jones, the D.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:52 am
The Jones case is different — in Knotts, the cops were not reponsible for placing the canister into the vehicle. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:56 am
In those cases, lenders will want to review the contract and may requests amendments to protect the lender’s interests. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
Clinton declined, and Kerri-Ann Jones, assistant secretary of state for oceans and international environment and scientific affairs, will testify next week instead. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
The lower court had reversed Jones’ conviction, saying the FBI needed a warrant to track Jones. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:20 pm
To be added to our email circulation with MUCH more law, click here and specify whether you wish to be added to our CRIMINAL, CIVIL or HEALTH & INSURANCE Recent Decisions of Interest. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 6:05 am
Read fairly, Citizens United merely says that banning certain kinds of corporate expenditures infringes the constitutional interests of human beings. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 3:33 am
Steven Daman, Officer Juan Ornelas and Officer Donald Jones. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm
Jones, referring to respondent Antoine Jones) is currently considering virtually the same issue addressed by the New York court, but in the criminal context. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
Jones and Ms. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
For more on the Amistad case, see Howard Jones's Mutiny on the Amistad (Oxford, 1988), among other treatments. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:13 pm
So I was interested to see that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the make-whole doctrine in an insurance subrogation case, in Jones v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
For United States Dept. of Justice, Interested Party: Susan Frances Knight, U.S. [read post]
