Search for: "In Re Doe I" Results 4341 - 4360 of 70,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2017, 4:47 am by Marty Lederman
  I hope I am mistaken about that—but it's difficult to come up with any other explanation for it.In this post, I’ll try to identify many of the most remarkable characteristics of the SG’s petition. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 7:19 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
WARNINGS: DO NOT travel outside of the United States Beneficiaries of parole in place through Keeping Families Together must NOT depart the United States, because parole does not authorize re-entry into the United States after departure. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 8:49 pm
A number of institutions are re-evaluating their business strategies and OTS examiners are being vigilant to evaluate any changes. [read post]
10 May 2008, 9:15 am
The statute reads as follows and I have emphazised the section ruled upon in In Re the Custody of G.J. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 10:18 am
I’m less sure what we’re supposed to do when the government use a suspicion-testing technological device with unknown capabilities. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm by John Culhane
maybe they’re the same ones who wrote me). [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I blogged yesterday about the tort law questions raised by Doe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:43 am
And true, when you apply for a job, you’re supposed to say you’re a convicted felon, but nobody really does anyway, and the worst that could happen to you if you don’t say it, is that they just fire you after awhile when they find it out. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
"We're all sensitive people," as Marvin Gaye sang in the begging-you-to-do-what-I-want song "Let's Get It On. [read post]