Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 4341 - 4360 of 18,403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2007, 2:29 pm
It's a good time to re-examine just how ineffective, unfair and cruel the death penalty is, as ACLU Capitol Punishment Project Director John Holdridge points out in an op-ed in the Austin American-Statesmen:Capital punishment is a failed government program and a colossal stain on our criminal justice system. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:13 pm by Jeff Gamso
  May do it because, darn it, there just aren't any real issues here.Still, as Justice Souter recognized in a footnote to his dissent in Smith v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm by Bona Law PC
Brief of the United States (Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission), in support of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Rasier, LLC, v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 5:02 am by SHG
You’re playing a dangerous game. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog  In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3) as amended by the… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:59 am
The Court granted leave to appeal in In re Hansen Minor, Case No. 139507. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by jpfaff
Eliminating the fiction surely must advance justice. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:31 am by Kate Fort
The post does not mention federal Indian law, or Adoptive Parents v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent from the denial of certiorari in Plumley v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, we're conducting our own audit, but don't want to alarm them unnecessarily. [read post]