Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 5,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The Queen (New Zealand) [2007] UKPC 33 (10 May 2007). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
It is therefore the applicant who is entitled to file requests in grant proceedings before the EPO (see for example A 93(1)(b) (request for early publication), R 70(1) (request for examination) and R 71(4) (request for amendments)). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Rev., Issue 1 (forthcoming Nov. 2007). [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Rev., Issue 1 (forthcoming Nov. 2007). [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm
Proponents of amending the venue rules have an initially plausible-sounding concern: the Eastern District of Texas handles a large percentage of patent infringement lawsuits and one judge within that district handles a disproportionate share of those cases. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
” Significantly, the Communique called on the UNSC to defer the matter under art. 16 of the Statute. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:10 pm
Stamer often has worked, extensively on these and other workforce and performance related matters. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:19 pm
Not satisfied, the Gustafsons filed a First Amended Complaint and now continue to seek damages. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 5:11 pm
The matter was then appealed to the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, citing in part the public interest override under the Act, and a decision was released on June 1, 2016. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
McLaughlin[1] and Alexander E. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
IPSO Rulings Three rulings and a resolution statement have been published by IPSO’s Complaints Committee this week: 03480-18 Nottingham City Council v The Sun, provision 1 (accuracy), no breach after investigation 04498-18 Handling v The Scottish Sun, provisions 1, 2 (privacy) and 4 (intrusion into grief or shock) 04743-18 Sykes v Huddersfield Examiner, provisions 1 and 4, no breach after investigation Resolution Statement 06660-18 Rix v Southern… [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
People bent on trumpeting the unity of the Roberts Court should avert their gaze now: three of the decisions split 5-4, with AMK joining the cons on 1 and the libs on 1. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
International agreements could help reduce this dissonance, and rationalize surveillance rules to promote international commerce, law enforcement, protection of civil liberties, and the worldwide rule of law. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:52 pm
On appeal, the CAFC affirmed the ruling on validity but remanded for a trial on infringement. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
After paying the attorney the $2 fee (1/3 of the $6 increase from $4 to $10), the property owner receives only $8. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
Feb. 18, 2010 Mem. and Order at 10-11, 15-16. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
Thus the only purpose of such a remittal would be to give the appellant a further opportunity to amend its case to rely on new facts, such as new, more restricted, claims. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:25 am
” Court Addresses Claims in Amended Complaint Following Termination of LLC’s License Agreement for Las Vegas Steakhouse Original Homestead Restaurant, Inc. v Seibel, 2020 NY Slip Op 32149(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 1, 2020]. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:21 pm
Petitioner ______________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT ______________________________________________________________________ [1] Sylvio Langevin claims ownership of the Earth [1]. [read post]
