Search for: "Louisiana Supreme Court" Results 4341 - 4360 of 6,294
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2011, 4:54 am
Supreme Court review the Louisiana state court jury system and mandate it to require unanimous jury verdicts in all criminal cases. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
Therefore, the court held that the district court erred by not dismissing the claims against the federal government. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  (The Supreme Court held that, despite the fact that New York state law precluded asserting these violations in a class action, in federal court Rule 23 controlled and therefore class certification could be sought in federal court.) [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:07 am by admin
Supreme Court decision, it noted that “prosecutors … are necessarily permitted to be zealous in their enforcement of the law. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:26 am
This issue was brought to light in a recent Supreme Court of Louisiana case when insurance company Continental was sued for indemnification by a manufacturing company, T&L. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:42 am by Russ Bensing
  Mason and the partner got out from under; there was no evidence to indicate that the partner was ever involved in any of this, and Mason’s office was positioned to argue the same thing, buttressed further by the broad absolute immunity a prosecutor generally enjoys and the Supreme Court’s earlier decision this year in Connick v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm by Scott Dodson
Third, the Supreme Court is charting this course on its own. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:37 am
However, upon the Louisiana Supreme Court's grant of supervisory writ, the court specifically explored whether an actual "double service" was indeed required. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:56 am
Audubon Indemnity Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court assessed penalties against an insurer that failed to pay the uncontested portion of a claim and refused coverage for a loss that was clearly included in the policy. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:00 am by Jana Singer
  The Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:45 am
Dutra, the Supreme Court discussed the distinction drawn by the general maritime law between watercraft that are permanently affixed to the shore or resting on the ocean floor and those that are temporarily stationed in a particular location. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 11:20 am by John McFarland
The Supreme Court agreed with the trial court, holding that "Bluegreen breached its duty to [the non-executive mineral owners] by filing the restrictive covenants. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:22 am
Supreme Court Case and dismissed all general maritime law claims except for those alleging a physical injury to propery/proprietary interest. [read post]