Search for: "Michael Marks"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 10,757
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2016, 3:43 am
crseidcode=1073Fri. 8 April 2016:Michael Frazer (University of East Anglia) - ʻThe Ethics of Social Explanation: Causal and Interpretive Approaches as Expressions of (Dis)Respect for Subjectsʼ - Legal and Political Theory Workshop Series, NUI GalwayDetails at http://www.nuigalway.ie/business-public-policy-law/school-of-law/research/lptheory/Sat. 9 April 2016:Legal Capacity Conference 2016 - UCC CCJHR and IMHLA conference, School of Law, University College CorkDetails… [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 10:36 pm
The young Michael J being spookily on the money. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 9:51 am
Specifically, the firm and Voldness failed to mark certain of the customer order tickets for the purchase of the shares as solicited.Fulcrum Securities, LLC (Saint Louis, Missouri)Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it failed to adequately enforce its WSPs to adequately detect, investigate and, if appropriate, report potentially suspicious activities or manipulative trading by customers in securities transactions… [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am
Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, Greg Lipper at Harvard Law’s Bill of Health blog, and Justin Sadowsky of Dubitante provide further commentary. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 10:58 am
KELLY II of California; THOMAS GARCIA of Florida; CLARK CARR of California; MICHAEL DAPALMA of California; DAVID MISCAVIGE of California; NICHOLAS THIEL of Michigan; DAVID S. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm
” —Michael E. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 10:37 am
General Michael V. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:02 am
Posted by Michael J. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 4:03 pm
McCoy and Mark Fazlollah of The Philadelphia Inquirer have a news update that begins, "A judicial tribunal found disgraced former Justice J. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:35 pm
Rev. 341 (2010) 2 96 Lemley, Mark A.; Risch, Michael; Sichelman, Ted; Wagner, R. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
appeared first on Michael Geist. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
Mark Vanhegan QC took the stage to offer his insights. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 3:25 am
Bite Mark Evidence as an Example of Junk Science One great example of junk science being offered to Texas criminal juries by prosecutors is bite mark evidence, which is extremely controversial and considered unreliable by most. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm
This is bold and revisionist history in the traditions of Willard Hurst, Theda Skocpol, Michael Katz, and Jerry Mashaw. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:42 am
Rubio’s Demise Marks the Last Gasp of the Republican RebootWashington Post – Robert Costa and Philip Rucker | Published: 3/15/2016 U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:32 am
Campaign Finance “Even as Political Spending Explodes, Disclosure Remains Hazy” by Mary Spicuzza (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel) and Jeremy White (Sacramento Bee) for CTNewsJunkie.com Arizona: “House Panel OKs Significant Changes to Campaign Finance Laws” by Howard Fischer (Capitol Media Services) for Arizona Daily Star Hawaii: “Honolulu Ethics Director on Leave after Internal Investigation” by Anita Hofschneider for Honolulu Civil Beat Hawaii: “Passing The… [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Additional coverage comes from Mark Walsh of Education Week, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Anthony Zurcher of the BBC, Michael Bobelian in two posts for Forbes, Callum Borchers, Glenn Kessler, and Janell Ross of The Washington Post, Tim McDonnell of Mother Jones, and Russell Berman of The Atlantic. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am
Hosted by Allen & Overy at 5:50 pm for 6:00, counsel for both parties (Mark Vanhegan QC, Michael Hicks and Jonathan Moss) will discuss the case and their reactions to the Supreme Court decision. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 12:38 pm
” The establishment of the Center for Global Engagement was announced on Monday by the “new anti-ISIS message czar” Michael Lumpkin as a replacement of “previous less-than-successful efforts. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 11:12 am
Basically, “fraud” is considered a criminal act because people (victims, marks) get hurt by it. [read post]
