Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 4,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
But what precisely is the freedom of speech? [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:33 pm
Defendants assert that an intermediate level of judicial scrutiny is proper here, given the "zoning-like" aims of the statute. * * * It is clear to us that HEA 1042 is precisely the sort of content-based restriction necessitating examination through the lens of strict scrutiny. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
Schwab v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
To survive pre-emption, the state-law requirement need not be phrased in the identical language as its corresponding [federal] requirement; indeed, it would be surprising if a common-law requirement used the same phraseology as [the federal standard]. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:41 pm
The US Supreme Court today released a very significant decision on maritime punitive damages in the Exxon Valdez case, Baker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:14 pm
As I will explain, dicta in this Court's decision in Coker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
Angelo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:39 pm
Bogue In the case of Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
Schwab v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
(Bell v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:25 am
Gunter, 462 F.3d 237 (3d Cir. 2006), which set forth the following three-step process that district courts must use for sentencing: (1) Courts must continue to calculate a defendant's Guidelines sentence precisely as they would have before United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 2:01 pm
Underwood v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:21 pm
None precisely similar is cited in the briefs of counsel. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 3:13 pm
See Victor Stanley Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary… [read post]
31 May 2008, 1:00 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:31 am
From In re Hill (City National Bank v. [read post]
