Search for: "People v Word"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 17,913
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2020, 8:07 pm
Think about that.McLaren v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
A Petition entitled “Exploiting People in the Public Eye” has been launched demanding new and stricter laws to safeguard people in the public eye and has attracted over 150,000 signatures. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 5:20 pm
So, sure, you got five-sevenths of the people who voted. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
Over thirty years ago, Chief Justice Dickson for the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Action Travail des Femmes v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm
UNI’s mission is to create a better world for working people by means of organisational activities and by seeking action at political and regulatory level, thereby striving to improve working conditions and raise employment standards in the services sectors around the world. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 7:29 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 5:26 am
You may think them wrong, childish or foolish, but people feel as they feel, much as someone might feel unsafe at hearing a word they’re informed is problematic. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm
In other words, "the sorts of weapons protected were those 'in common use at the time.'" Id. at 627 (quoting United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
See Wise v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm
The Classic Antitrust Case of Toys “R” Us v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 3:09 pm
In late March, the Supreme Court will hear argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Torres v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 2:58 pm
Due to the Supreme Court of the United States’ Ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm
In Raincoast Conservation Foundation v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am
I’ll say a few words at the end of this post about states and their quarantine powers. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:09 pm
The AG observes that:The referring court only asks the Court of Justice for an interpretation of Directive 2001/29.I beg to differ - the words "in particular" say the very opposite. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
Again, the answer can probably be reduced to one word: politics. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
Since "vbigga" is, on the keyboard, very close to a different word -- the keys "vb" being right next to the "n". [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm
For abstract ideas, the Examiners must determine whether the claim falls into at least one of three enumerated categories: (1) “mathematical concepts” (mathematical relationships, mathematical formulas or equations, mathematical calculations); (2) “certain methods of organizing human activity” (fundamental economic principles or practices, commercial or legal interactions, managing personal behavior or relationships or interactions between people); and (3)… [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th Dept 2006]). [read post]
