Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 55,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2010, 8:21 am
DYFS v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:04 am
Timely filing of a grievanceHill v NYC Board of Ed., 258 AD2d 462A collective bargaining agreement provided that an employee must file a grievance “within a reasonable period not to exceed 75 days following the action complained of. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 12:51 pm
In the case of Mandarelli, et al v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:14 pm
the power of attorney is unused. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm
While Bond v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:43 am
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am
In Dawson v Steager, 586 U. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 6:00 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 3:35 am
Paul Horwitz The leak of the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Edward Rubin The Supreme Court’s use of the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
by Dennis Crouch Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Mandel: Plenary Power v. the Professor, by Peter H. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 4:16 pm
In Kelo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Dennis Crouch, of Patently-O, provides a great summary on the ITC’s role in patent infringement cases and how it’s power to grant injunctive relief compares with that of the federal courts. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am
And the absence of deference on the Article III question is bolstered by the Supreme Court's far-more-formalistic approach to departures from Article III, as typified by Chief Justice Roberts's opinion for the majority in Stern v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 7:26 am
Circuits—in denying shareholder claims against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac over the government-sponsored enterprises’ net worth sweep (Saxton v. [read post]