Search for: "Reach v. State" Results 4341 - 4360 of 37,354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am by John Jascob
The Supreme Court stayed enforcement of the CPP, and before a decision could be reached the Trump Administration issued the 2019 Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, which repealed the CPP.The ACE rule established emission guidelines for states to use when developing plans to limit CO2 at their coal-fired electric generating units. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 5:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Accordingly, in this procedural posture, the Court will deny the Parties' joint motion to seal… And a similar result across the state line in Judge Gerald Pappert's opinion the day before, in Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:12 am by CMS
Notably, the Court of Appeal stated that subsequent case law, including Sage v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] UKHL 22, has placed greater emphasis on the need to view planning permissions as a whole rather than as consent for delineable acts of development. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 1:17 pm by Holly Brezee
Appx. 590 (7th Cir., 2018) (without reaching the issue of nominative fair use); Slep-Tone Entm’t Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am by Bernard Bell
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
While plaintiff said she will visit the state once the Covid crisis is over, "those plans are no more definite than the plans of the respondent in Lujan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:28 am by Florian Mueller
There is a similarly encouraging trend in the United States, with ever more lawmakers from both sides of the aisle backing the Open App Markets Act (OAMA). [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:55 am by Michael C. Dorf
He writes: Suppose that in 1924 this Court had expressly reaffirmed Plessy v. [read post]