Search for: "STATE v. SMITH" Results 4341 - 4360 of 9,999
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2023, 10:43 pm by Florian Mueller
That was fortunate because Mr Justice Marcus Smith, the President of the CAT, suspended the livestream for the first couple of hours. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Newman v City of Tonawanda 2022 NY Slip Op 03834 Decided on June 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Layla Kuhl
  MCL 777.31” The Court again considered the applications in People v Corrin and People v Miller, which were held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Smith, which was decided this past December. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am by Gail Heriot
Smith (1990), the Supreme Court has authoritatively decided that the Equal Protection Clause (and hence Title VI) is violated only when the state (or a recipient of federal funds) intentionally discriminates. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:19 pm
The doctrine is based on the inherent power of courts to enforce their judgments (see Degen v United States, supra at 823), and it has long been recognized and applied to those who evade the law while simultaneously seeking its protection (see Bonahan v Nebraska, 125 US 692 [1887]; Smith v United States, 94 US 97 [1876])" (Matter of Skiff-Murray v Murray, 305 AD2d 751, 752 [2003]). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:15 am by Gregory Dell
June 22, 2011 - A recent opinion from the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals has helped clarify the rules as to who you can sue in actions for benefits under a long term disability policy See Cyr v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:22 pm by Orin Kerr
Justice Harlan’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 3:58 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Eluding the proper scope of federal jurisdiction: United States v. [read post]