Search for: "State v. Bui"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2014, 3:18 pm
“The extension is requested,” the motion said, “because the federal government intends to move to hold this appeal in abeyance pending the Supreme Court’s decision in King v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm
The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:53 pm
The employer was also granted summary judgment on counterclaims for fraud, money had and received, and defamation, as well as sanctions under federal and state law. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:15 pm
The second panel successfully built upon the issues raised earlier in the morning and injected the role of technology in both facilitating and hindering solutions to the security-v-privacy situation. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 11:06 am
Equality bites.Mike McClainUnited States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
Tuesday afternoon I had the pleasure of debating/discussing King v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:19 am
In Mauvis v Herisse, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 5659412 (C.A.1 (Mass.) the mother and father were both citizens of Haiti. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:01 pm
If you buy your competitor’s trademarks as keywords, it’s not advisable to sue your competitors for buying your keywords. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
King v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 12:10 pm
In King v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:51 am
If King v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:09 am
California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
The notice states that “The Appellants wholly discontinues this Appeal on a without costs basis on consent. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am
” The incentive is even more powerful when linked to a mandatory redemption or buy-out at an unfavorable price and/or on unfavorable terms for the terminated owner. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 10:49 am
No obstruction, for stolen alfalfa.United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:14 pm
From Bush v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:49 am
Rather than waiting until Monday to announce its action, which would be the usual mode at this time in the Court year, the Justices released the order granting review of King v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 11:57 am
The court was not buying what the plaintiffs were selling. [read post]
