Search for: "State v. Frame"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 6,747
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2013, 12:05 pm
If you are in NC state court and want to take the deposition of an out-of-state non-party, the Order last week in Out of the Box Developers, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:19 am
Klem v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 6:52 am
American Express Company v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 2:51 pm
Despite being framed as “lack of invention,” these are not obviousness cases. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
Every year, my distinguished colleague at Penn State, Jan M. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:37 am
Here, with McCormick v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
” This is an intentional framing of the activity and identity of these groups so as to treat them within the framework of co-belligerency for purposes of international law. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:15 am
The immunity benefit enjoyed by such state-run technology transfer licensing programs was most recently made clear in Cyanotech Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:55 am
The upcoming SCOTUS decisions on the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act (denying federal benefits to same-sex couples that are legally married in their states) and California’s Proposition 8 (a voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage), in addition to their potentially profound personal significance to persons on all sides of the marriage debate, will no doubt provide rich fodder for human rights jurists. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:26 pm
As we reported previously, the Federal Circuit's decision in this case appears to conflict with its 2011 decision in Classen v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
Schlosser: holistic processing—may shift loss v. gain frames. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers: we are faced with a specific problem, and rely on the lawyers to frame the issues. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Framing cyber conflict as “war” entails attempts to apply the law of war; but the conflation of activities that powers the “war” framing undermines the application of the law of war, creating a “double bind” situation in which it seems that we simultaneously must but cannot apply the law of war to cyber war. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 2:49 am
That at least appears to be conclusion drawn by any reasonable Kat rom the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C‑561/11 Fédération Cynologique Internationale v Federación Canina Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza, which was published on Curia today. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:14 pm
Without embracing the equation made in Reynolds v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:45 am
& Anor. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
In their new work, Jim and Linda seek to show how liberalism, properly framed, can achieve this -- contrary to the critiques of communitarians on the one hand, and the desires of libertarians and minimalists on the other. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
MINTON v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
MINTON v. [read post]
