Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 4341 - 4360 of 5,191
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2010, 7:48 am by Paul Levy
(I have not analyzed whether ML-Implode would have had a good summary judgment motion) Rather than showing flaws in the ruling, this incident reminds us of the urgent need to adopt a federal anti-SLAPP statute, because all state anti-SLAPP laws are not alike. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:39 am by V.Venkatesan
In his speech, Joshi gave eight good reasons for its deletion. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
But I suppose it’s good compared to the en banc court’s just affirming the panel. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:22 pm
558/08 Portakabin Ltd and Portakabin BV v Primakabin BV, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands).Portakabin Ltd, who made and sold mobile buildings, owned the Benelux trade mark PORTAKABIN for goods in Classes 6 (metal buildings, parts and building materials) and 19 (non-metal buildings, parts and building materials). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
In Forbes, law professor Richard Epstein criticizes the McDonald ruling, arguing that “[t]here is, quite simply, no good structural reason why the state cannot limit the right to keep and bear arms if the full text of the Second Amendment is in play. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:39 am by Russ Bensing
City of Chicago, holding that the 2nd Amendment’s individual right to bear arms pronounced two years ago in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm by Lisa McElroy
Heller – the landmark case holding that the federal government cannot limit the right of individuals to keep and bear arms – should also apply to states and municipalities. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:42 am by Matthew Scarola
” Finally, David Kopel argues in the Washington Times that Justice Sotomayor’s recent dissent in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
ELENA KAGAN: Senator Feinstein, I do think that the continuing holding of Roe and Doe v. [read post]