Search for: "State v. Heard"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 6:21 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: SC18565 - Kaddah v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:54 am
(docket 06-5618) was heard by the Court on Feb. 20, along with a second Guidelines case (Rita v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court… [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 2:15 pm
Next, in Douglas v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:45 pm
” Al-Harbi v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:09 am
A state statute provided that you had to have lights on at night while driving. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:47 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Sumitomo Pharma Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:41 am
We believe this objectivity requirement is consistent with the quality control element of [State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:26 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:32 am
When the Court heard argument Monday morning in No. 10-290, Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, it had as distinguished a group of advocates as it is likely to have this Term: former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (for i4i), former Deputy Solicitor General Tom Hungar (for Microsoft) and Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart (for the United States, arguing in support of i4i). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:59 am
This was addressed in a case heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:25 pm
Florida a replay of United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
They want and expect to be seen and heard by the Council. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:33 am
In the case of Minkin v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 3:35 pm
Thirdly, it followed that the State had failed to protect B’s physical and psychological integrity and that there had been a violation of the positive duty under Article 8 (applying X & Y v Netherlands). [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” He stated that the value of intelligence can only be judged in hindsight. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:39 pm
In any event, this issue is now up before the Ninth Circuit en banc, which heard argument last week on it in Apache Stronghold v. [read post]
