Search for: "State v. So " Results 4341 - 4360 of 117,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner filed an appeal pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the District’s decision.The Appellate Division, sustaining the District’s action, noted that in addition to charges alleging excessive socializing and failure to complete assigned duties, Charge V, Specification 1, alleged that Petitioner stated that he "wanted to get a gun and go postal on this place. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner filed an appeal pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the District’s decision.The Appellate Division, sustaining the District’s action, noted that in addition to charges alleging excessive socializing and failure to complete assigned duties, Charge V, Specification 1, alleged that Petitioner stated that he "wanted to get a gun and go postal on this place. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by David Hart QC
Biffa, CA, 19 March 2012, read judgment For the last year or so, the law of nuisance has been in a state of flux pending this appeal. [read post]
As if Michael Gove MP needed further reminding, in wake of Colin Yeo’s appearance on World at One on Wednesday where he pointed out the fundamental error of the Justice Secretary’s assertion that Britain cannot deport EEA nationals with a criminal record, the Supreme Court in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 makes clear that EEA nationals can be deported by virtue of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006,… [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 3(2) provides that in cases in which extradition is so refused, the Requesting State may request that the case be submitted to the competent authorities of the Requested State for prosecution. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 10:05 am by Paul Horwitz
 The Alabama Law Review will be hosting its own fiftieth anniversary symposium later this year; it's not surprising to me that two states in the Deep South, which figured so prominently in the outcome of the case, have felt duty-bound to revisit it. [read post]