Search for: "State v. Sotomayor" Results 4341 - 4360 of 5,862
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 2:03 pm by Kali Borkoski
The Court held that petitioners’ state-law design-defect and failure-to-warn claims fall within the field of locomotive equipment regulation pre-empted by the Locomotive Inspection Act, as that field was defined in Napier v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am by Michael F. Smith
  “Under the majority’s test,” Justice Sotomayor wrote, “four wrongs apparently make a right.” Conclusion In largely sidestepping the second, broader question on which certiorari was granted – whether Malley and its exclusionary-rule corollary, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:26 am by Anne Bowen Poulin
The Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday in Blueford v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:21 am
That stance is at odds with the US Supreme Court decision in United States v Jones (January 23, 2012), about which I posted yesterday. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:38 am by Paul Venard
On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court issued three decisions. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:28 am by Lyle Denniston
  So it was during the argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by Kali Borkoski
Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justice Ginsburg. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:30 am by Kent Scheidegger
Lambert:  Justice Sotomayor joins the majority on deference to the state court holding supported by more than one independent ground. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am by appealattorneylaw
Now that the Mardi Gras season is over, the federal criminal defense and immigration defense lawyers in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami Dade county may want to take a few moments moment to read a newly issued opinion from the United States Supreme Court: Kawashima v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Sonia Sotomayor joined), was predicated on the view that the installing of a GPS device was a trespass, and so this physical intrusion needed to be grounded on a warrant to comply with the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:17 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
Justice Ginsburg dissented joined by Justices Sotomayor and Breyer stating, "I would not train, as the Court does, on the question whether there can be custody within custody. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:32 am by Kali Borkoski
  Justice Ginsburg filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, which Justices Breyer and Sotomayor joined. [read post]