Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 6,642
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 5:30 pm
In the second post, the present position will be compared with the current state of the law in Germany, with some references to the law in the United States of America. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
(D.); VillaromanR. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:18 pm
[Only one federal firearms prohibitor does not require any specfic finding of fact] On November 7, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the only Second Amendment merits case this term, United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:13 pm
The position is created pursuant to the state constitution, currently at Article V, Section 1 of the 1970 Illinois Constitution. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
Many people excluded from the United States because of the Muslim ban, such as those who received a once-in-a-lifetime immigration visa via the “diversity lottery,” have still not been admitted. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cir. 2012) (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:45 am
So in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 5:42 pm
On 15 July 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the use of full-body scanners to screen air travellers in the case of Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), et al. v United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:50 am
In fact, plaintiffs allege that Montana has warmed more than most of the contiguous United States because northern latitudes heat more quickly. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:17 am
The justices were cautious at Tuesday morning’s argument in Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
For the G7 the language is grounded in the principles of the collective imperium built around the United Nations system and its community of states lead by a vanguard group of powerful states. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:55 am
For example, the United States Supreme Court views an arbitration clause as a specialized kind of forum selection clause, and in December 2013 reiterated the strong presumption in favor of the validity of arbitration provisions in Atlantic Marine Construction Company, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:52 am
In the Court's view, the strong consensus existing among the Contracting States in this respect is of considerable importance and narrows the margin of appreciation left to the respondent State in the assessment of the permissible limits of the interference with private life in this sphere. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 9:56 am
United States, involved the conflict between state abortion bans and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), a federal law that requires life- and health-saving care, including abortion, in emergency departments. [read post]
