Search for: "True v. United States" Results 4341 - 4360 of 9,184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 8:41 am by David Oscar Markus
United States, 328 U.S. 582, 597 (1946) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting). [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 5:32 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The documents included two Extremism Analysis Unit Home Office reports and a Counter Terrorism Policing report. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by Karen Tani
“There is a very strong feeling that I have,” Guido says, citing examples from Italy to South Africa to Israel to the United States, “that we are all in danger of being discriminators. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 1:46 am by Florian Mueller
Moreover, FTC rules of practice state that the FTC 'expects all parties to engage in meaningful discussions with staff.' [...] [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 1:04 am
Last Monday the US Supreme Court granted the writ of certiorari in the Costco Wholesale Corp v Omega SA case. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:21 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The victim’s cousin immediately called the victim’s father who happened to be less than a half a mile away and had served as a combat medic in the United States armed forces. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 8:01 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
While this may seem like common sense, the way in which the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) runs the program is far from common sense. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 5:58 pm
Decades after the United States Supreme Court issued its 1954 desegregation mandate in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
 “There are three components of a true Brady violation: The evidence at issue must be favorable to the accused, either because it is exculpatory, or because it is impeaching; that evidence must have been suppressed by the State, either willfully or inadvertently; and prejudice must have ensued. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 11:52 am by Joshua Thompson and Ralph Kasarda
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. [read post]