Search for: "Turner"
Results 4341 - 4360
of 6,465
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 7:28 am
There existed a written agreement between Turner and the School District; however, Turner did not have agreements with any of the contractors or subcontractors. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:03 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Turner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:55 pm
” Turner Broad. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:10 pm
Although a nondiscrimination requirement arguably promotes speech rather than proscribes it, the long-ago Turner case on “must-carry” obligations for cable already suggested that the valence of the requirement doesn’t really matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm
Turner adds to the urgency for such data and research. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:54 pm
Turner puts the spotlight on Civil Gideon issues both in context of “safeguards” and representation. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:51 pm
Indeed, the Court’s analysis in Turner closely tracks the analysis in Gagnon. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:39 pm
The Turner decision reflects the ongoing back and forth over child support enforcement efforts. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:37 pm
The Court: [California's] reliance on Turner Broadcasting is misplaced. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
First, the Court agreed with the 5th DCA’s conclusion in Turner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm
When the cable operators were fighting against obligations to carry broadcast channels on their systems, they failed to persuade the 1994 Supreme Court in Turner that the obligations were content-based. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:03 pm
Turner clearly provides an opportunity in such states to make significant advancement. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:58 am
That being said, the divergence between what should happen, and what actually happens in many court proceedings makes the issues of due process and fundamental fairness raised in the Turner case quite real. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
In Turner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:21 am
Over at Concurring Opinions, Jim Baillie's interesting post on the recent Turner decision will resonate with many ELS Blog readers. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 am
” Continuing the ongoing discussion at Concurring Opinions of the Court’s decision in Turner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am
United States, 09-1395 (held since 12/3/10, probably for Wal-Mart) Turner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:20 am
The underlying facts are awful. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:57 am
“Electronic Arts Has Right to Refer to John Dillinger in Its Video Games” [Volokh] Fans of “Civil Gideon” (constitutional entitlement to publicly funded lawyers in civil cases) glum that SCOTUS didn’t give idea much of a boost in Turner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Turner v. [read post]
